If all you wanted to do was help with climate change, you would end up working with smallholder farmers in Africa. That’s where over 80 per cent of all the suffering caused by climate change in this century is – smallholder farmers in Africa. Inset: Bill Gates PHOTOS | FILE
Bill Gates, the creator of the ubiquitous Microsoft Windows and now a global philanthropist, recently addressed the nations of the African Union at their annual summit in Addis Ababa and urged them to invest more in their health systems.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest private philanthropic organizations in the world and spends $2 billion a year on Africa alone, largely to improve health and agriculture with access to vaccines and more productive seeds.
At the summit, African leaders committed to increased spending on health for the 55 countries of the continent.
Ahead of his address to the summit, Gates spoke with Paul Schemm of The Washington Post about why Africa is so important to the world.
Here are excerpts from the interview.
QUESTION: We are in an era of donor a fatigue, a time when people want to cut back on aid abroad. Africa has come a long way, but as you pointed out, with 16 percent of the world’s population, it has 24 percent of the disease burden and 50 percent child mortality. Why would you want to invest your time and energy in this place? It never gets better, is what some people think back home.
ANSWER: That’s a problem if we don’t clear up that perception – if you feel that Africa was poor, Africa is poor, we sent a lot of money there, and they are still poor, and it didn’t make any difference.
Africa has had a good 20 years by relative measures. Childhood death has been cut in half, deaths from HIV are half of what they were at their peak, deaths from malaria are half of what they were at their peak.
Other continents don’t have quite the disease challenge that Africa has. I won’t say we have donor fatigue.
The people who actually go to the [donor] hearings are as excited today and as committed as ever.
When the executive branch of the US said cut the foreign aid budget, which would have meant cutting [the US HIV prevention program] PEPFAR, which would have meant 5 million additional HIV deaths, the Congress didn’t even think about it.
I engage in African health because with the right partnership, we can get a lot done, and it’s the last place on earth where [in some places] 20 percent of the kids die before the age of 5.
It is not unrealistic to get that number [to] 4 per cent. Rich countries are about 1 per cent. We won’t get to 1 per cent in a 20-30 year time frame, but we can get down to 4 per cent. Going from 20 percent to 4 per cent, the total number of lives is amazing.
Q: A lot African leaders will say the Europeans and the Americans will do this or that with aid, but when the Chinese come, they give us loans and we build a port, we build a superhighway, we build railroads.
This is the kind of aid we need. You are following the approach of Western countries, which is capacity building and health. Why is that? Why not help build a bridge?
A: Our two things we concentrate on are health, by far the biggest, and agriculture, and then a few other things like financial services. It’s important to distinguish between basic social services like a vaccine that keeps a kid alive and bridges and roads.
They are both very important. We like roads where you can get the vaccines in, and you can get the fertilizer in, and kids can go out to school. Roads are very important. But the Chinese, that’s not aid.
They aren’t giving those roads away. There is largely sovereign debt being created to pay for those things.
Great if you bid your contracts out well, and somebody comes in with the lowest price with the appropriate conditions in terms of trying to train local workers and trying to take care of the environment, and hope that no one was bribed so it really is the lowest-price contract and not the contract that had the best bribe associated with it.
Q: China and India did this amazing job of moving people up out of poverty. Now in Africa, you will have by 2050, 86 per cent of the world’s extreme poor living here. Is that breakout going to be possible here, or will they be left behind?
A: It hangs in the balance. They’ve certainly been left behind in that they are the poorest continent, even though they’ve had a good 20 years by many measures.
It hangs in the balance of how much catch-up will do it – they could also fall further behind. Africa is unique in that it still has significant population growth.
There is this huge shift where the non-African part of the world births are going down a lot, and in Africa the births are going up. We have passed peak [births] about 12 years ago, but Africa has not.
These babies are [being] born in the toughest places in the world. The average age in Africa is 18, and it’s going to stay 18 for a long time.
The average age in the other continents is in the late 30s, and it’s going up. With sub-Saharan Africa, it really is where the world’s creativity is about helping with education, health and governance and agricultural productivity.
Just take climate change. If all you wanted to do was help with climate change, you would end up working with smallholder farmers in Africa.
That’s where over 80 per cent of all the suffering caused by climate change in this century is – smallholder farmers in Africa.
Q: I am struck by the way, when you talk about Africa and the population, you see it as an advantage. What I’m used to hearing is Africa is a menace for the rest of the world, through migration. You see it differently. How do you explain it to the rest of the world, that Africa is not this population menace that’s going to overrun us?
A: Having half the world’s young people on this continent, you’ve really got to hope those people in terms of innovation, stability and education are contributing to the world instead of just being something you worry about in terms of migration, instability and epidemics that come out of Africa From a pure humanitarian basis, those are people, and what we take for granted, all of them should have.
If you care about equality, getting rid of extreme poverty should absolutely rise to the top of the list. If you think of other humans in other countries having any importance. So there is the moral issue.
That is an equality-driven one. And then there is, hey, let’s have this world that’s really stable.
We do know that once you get economies to a certain level, the quality of governance goes up a lot.
Putting it in the positive framework is the right thing to do, and it is how I think of it.
It requires pretty broad thinking, and where you get that thinking you don’t get it in the daily news, no matter how enlightened the reporter is.
You could have run the headline that 137,000 people exited extreme poverty today.
You could have run that headline 25 years every day, and it would have been true news.
But what day was that news? It’s kind of this gradual thing.
A lot of the ways the world has improved don’t fit this, “Hey, tell me about the latest disaster.” Mostly negative things fit that framework.
Source: The Citizen